Editorial Policy

Conspiracy Theory Wiki is committed to accuracy, neutrality, and transparency. This policy outlines how we research, write, classify, and maintain our content.

Neutrality

We present conspiracy theories as cultural, historical, and social phenomena. Our role is to document — not to advocate or debunk. Each theory is presented with its claims, available evidence, and counterarguments.

Classification System

Every theory is assigned an evidence-based status after review:

• Confirmed: Verified through declassified documents, official investigations, court proceedings, or credible whistleblower testimony corroborated by independent evidence.
• Debunked: Contradicted by verifiable evidence from multiple independent sources, with no credible counter-evidence.
• Unresolved: Insufficient publicly available evidence to reach a conclusion. Active investigation may be ongoing.
• Mixed: Multiple distinct claims exist within the theory. Some have been confirmed or debunked, while others remain unresolved.

Sourcing Requirements

All factual claims must be supported by at least one of:

• Peer-reviewed academic publications
• Official government documents or reports
• Court records and legal proceedings
• Reporting from established news organizations
• Primary source documents (letters, memos, transcripts)

Health & Safety Content

Theories involving medical claims, public health, or personal safety include a prominent disclaimer directing readers to qualified professionals and established medical consensus. We do not provide medical advice.

Corrections

If you identify an error in our content, please contact us. We will investigate and issue corrections promptly. Corrections are noted at the top of affected articles.